Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prevent wrong Evolve behavior, pls do n't change meaning of mnemonic parameters #2213

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2016

Conversation

actislav
Copy link
Contributor

@actislav actislav commented Aug 2, 2016

pls, dont break the logic of evolve behavior, analyze and test your changes before commit to master, Evolve_KEPT_PokemonsAtStorageUsagePercentage have only one certain meaning. If you want change logic then pls rename parameter to EvolvePokemonsAtStorageUsagePercentage without KEPT.

Without this check people who wants to evolve pokemon with above IV or just with enough candy, but with options KeepPokemonsThatCanEvolve = false (case with default config for new users) will never have it, and even their pokemon might be transfered instead of evolving... (sry for my bad english)

…hanges before commit to master, Evolve*KEPT*PokemonsAtStorageUsagePercentage have only one certain meaning. If you want change logic then pls rename parameter to EvolvePokemonsAtStorageUsagePercentage without KEPT.

Without this check people who wants to evolve pokemon with above IV or just with enough candy, but with options KeepPokemonsThatCanEvolve = false (case with default config for new users) will never have it, and even their pokemon mightl be transfered instead of evolving...
@BennettStaley
Copy link

Fantastic work. Working as it did on ver 5.0.

@recon88 recon88 added the ready label Aug 2, 2016
@BornSupercharged BornSupercharged merged commit 8b59943 into NecronomiconCoding:master Aug 2, 2016
schnapster pushed a commit to schnapster/NecroBot that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
prevent wrong Evolve behavior, pls do n't change meaning of mnemonic parameters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants